From my perspective, reading the book Nicomachean Ethics is rather heavy at the start then, Aristotle's writing is very different from Savater , and somehow confused me, but as I went deeper into the reading I began to understand more easily what the author intended to convey and the end of the three chapters that we read, recognize them as a interesting reading, it makes us to meditate on issues that normally are not considered and which I intend to expose these through the following report. CHTMASSESSING.
Initially Aristotle begins by stating that "all accióny every election, tended to have some good" (Aristotle, 2006), this refers to any act we do by choice is to attain the highest good. A good that is the same for political science to morality.
For political science, the author argues that each judge it as long as the talk is of our knowledge, although "the end of political science policy is not knowledgeien spoken of throughout the entire first chapter is the one supreme good is the common good of every human being who aspires to be good (virtuous), an asset that must be "something of their own difficult to snatch its possessor "(Aristotle, 2006), a divine good, is so perfect that you want forever, is one that is sufficient by itself to make life pleasant, or whether it is self- is a state of fullness, is the good that has the highest degree of goodness, which covers all goods, both useful and necessary, is the most perfect, "is some soul activity conforms to virtue "(Aristotle, 2006), is the happiness . "Happiness is living and doing good" (Aristotle, 2006).
decoding To reach happiness as the highest good, Aristotle discusses the various virtues of this: Part of that there are 3 types of life, which takes unbalanced virtues as if they were the perfect virtue, these are: the first is governed by pleasure and this is the voluptuous life, second life this policy which takes the honor as the highest good and is ultimately life-profit where wealth is the end all, but these three goods are goods that are desired in order for another good is happiness, that is why we call these goods for pand together this will not lead to good health of the soul.
The soul has three elements: the passions, affections accompanied by pleasure and pain, the powers that are simply the capacity to suffer pleasures and finally, they are what we help you know if the pleasures are good or bad; Here Aristotle talks about the elements of soul and asked me how do you know?, what I mean is that you know how these elements constitute the soul of all, yes this helps to reach its conclusion, but for years the critical filosofíaaamp; ldquo; there is a middle ground of excess or defect, nor excess and deficiency of the average. "
man by nature tends to pleasure, "One of the oldest men's social fears: fear of pleasure" (Savater, 2008), to be deprived of something , which is why it is said that when we experience the 2 endpoints are easier to reach the midpoint.
The average of some pleasures that arise are: Generosity, magnanimity, be ambitious, be gentle, truthfulness, wit a man alive, am, Among the good men there is trust, security will never be unjust to each other, and all other requirements of true friendship "(Aristotle, 2006), but there are also friends by accident those who are seeking their own good or seeking pleasure and that is why we are kind when we are in this situation.
is also alleged that the young usually very confusing true friendship with friendship by accident, as well as fast as we are friends is as fast as we stop and these and should be according to the author to young peoplecute, mo can we know if we're not even sure there ourselves and we do not exist so these first two do not exist, and finally confused me too much to say that neither the children nor the youth or adults (referring to the different stages of life) have real friends and then what stage is it possible to have a loving relationship that does not fall into the simple association?
Laurencio Monzón, Luis Antonio Introduction to moral analysis
No publisher, 2008.
Aristotle's Nicomachean Ethics Grupo Editorial Tomo, 2006 Savater, Fernando
Ethics for Amador Ariel, 2008
0 comments:
Post a Comment