Gay Cruising Areas New Jersey

steal the game, this is an action, and that is something that Bart decides to do, something that is consciously and finally accióny it is not an intentional act.

2.

Event 1: Marge does not buy the video game Bart.

Event 2: Bart sees Jimbo and other fellow stealing things from the store.

Done: Bart wanted a video game. amp; iacute; to trying to buy and had seen their comrades stealing smoothly.

· Means: His coat.

·

Results: The trap.

·

Consequences: Marge is very disappointed in Ely decides to stop pampering.

4.

  In this case the will of bart, I wanted the game, but in this case depended not get his will but that of his mother to buy it or not and since he did not, é l import it without social or legal standards, decides to put his will and steal the game for the simple fact that we wanted.

5.

The importance of ethics in this situation is that it helps us know if the action that Bart made is good or bad.

6.

Is it good or badmental results that suffered by stealing and gaming.

8. The definition of human influence on the study of what happened to Bart, because we ask so much of their behavior depends on its and human nature and how much of this depends on the culture he has.

9. Under this case, one could say that as Bart saw his companions robbed, being that it could be that they were in the same situation, thenthought that what they did would be like what Kant's categorical imperative

and then he also should. "The categorical imperative states that generally how we act must be the way they act

any rational being to be found in the same circumstances." (Kant) . 10.

For Aristotle would say that Bart does not work as well, then not happy, because "it is the same as living well and doing good, be happy" (Aristotle; TVs, 2006) and could also relate Bart believes that finding the highest good in pleasure and did not find the middle, so virtuous, to not be swayed by their desires, and find the balance that would give ; to happiness. Something that has little to do with this also could be that Aristotle thought that Bart did not act with the rational mind, but with the irrational rationality are contradictory, since it left driven by instinct and not reason, neither pure nor ethics.

Cp; oacute n bad, because it mistakenly believed that he would find happiness in material and though some might have stolen the obligation to Bart was not.

Bibliography

Laurencio Monzón, Luis Antonio Introduction to moral analysis No publisher, 2008.

Aristotle Nicomachean Ethics Tomo Grupo Editorial, 2006 Savater, Fernando

Ethics for Amador

Ariel, 2008