In recent days there are two questions that have haunted my thoughts and what's new at the classroom, which caused only thing was that these were made more complex for me.
Last week we commented on morality, in how to apply it correctly without relying on that act according to what is imposed by a higher authority and was at this point that arose my doubt, because the definition of what is said to be moral standards and principles that help us decide what is right or wrong, based on that definition, I pregN I saw what emerged was the last class, which we talked about that all moral judgments can be a trial as long as it is based on an action (intentional) , bases ; ndome before I settled in a situation that fails to resolve whether an action would be considered an act and if so whether it could be a moral reckoning.
The situation is as follows:
Suppose, hypothetically, that a soldier ordered to kill a prisoner of war and if it then refuses to kill him & eac(Savater, 2008), concluded that this could change according to the present situation.
I would like to comment on their different points of view.
0 comments:
Post a Comment