Sunday, November 23, 2008

Spanish Wording For Wedding Reception I think I should be more responsible for my actions.

amp; rdquo;, finally both really made me see what I did was to avoid my responsibility and blame someone else, something that makes me weird because I almost half a year studying ethics and I made , with an error that I could theoretically fix before, but while ethics fails to apply to my daily life then this will not help.

of this situation so I can rescue that has to do with ethics is:

· & nbsp; First

which is a must to go to that party, this is important because it was a duty that I want to do or take as a commitment to myself, but because it was a serious commitment to my separate father and was a way to avoid a penalty.

· Another circumstance that I had to do is that I have the habit of closing my house because my sister usually does, making this not be a habit for me, "a man's virtue is that habit that makes goodHTMLXC · After realizing how bad I had applied my freedom obviously felt remorse "The remorse our freedom "(Savater, 2008).

· One thing I did was all well within the "Giving reasons and listen" (Savater 2008), or somehow did well to tell my father who first heard my arguments and then tell men all they wanted.

In conclusion I feel that I had to do was to be responsible and "The manager said yes, I've been me!" (Savater, 2008) and address consequences of my actions caused, I also think that blaming my dad was like myself want to become a spectator of my life, "They are happy who choose to become actors in their lives. Those who prefer to be spectators, let happiness slip through your hands. "(Anonymous), so I apply more ethics learned in my life to be happy. CHTML

Saturday, November 22, 2008

Little Overactive Thyroid

elected body of ethics, the reasons why he chose this subject were, so to speak, by elimination, so it was eliminating alternatives, one of which is to impart a scientific dissemination conference ; Chart, which I think is appropriate highlight, since it says that all he would do this is to "meet and what I consider one of the most basic need of modern people, ie superficial curiosity "(Wittgenstein, 1930) and give my opinion about these last two words" superficial curiosity "(Wittgenstein, 1930), it seemed important to highlight dichwords as they think he is right on the superficial curiosity is not an appropriate way of knowing things, but finally I differ because I think the superficial curiosity often leads us to know or do things that can turn into something of value for our lives.

Now it seems that after the above report should begin by expressing my ideas, which from my point of view, I think are the main in the conference, where you get your theory to the absolute value and relative value, "forget that happiness does not come as a result of getting something you do not want, but to recognize, appreciate and value whathave. "(Fredrick Koenig).

first thing Wittgenstein says about the ethics that would be for him his definition: "Ethics is research on the value or what really matters or (...) research on the meaning of life, or that which makes life worth living, or right way of life "(Wittgenstein, 1930), by the definition the first thing jump in my view was the word deserve, because I believe that life for the simple fact of being is amazing, important and absolutely worthy of living, because without life what would we be then?, & lethical use and are expressed incorrectly. The first of these words is good

, which when applied fairly to say that is something that satisfies the qualities that something must have for a particular purpose, or who has the ability to do something.

When the author attempts to exemplify these two values gives an example of a situation in which a man behaves badly, do not want to behave better, but should do so and says that this is an absolute discretion, but following his argument that occurs after I if I can imagine the man behaving differently so this may not be an absolute view, por On the other hand if you think like an ethical view and taking into account the definitions we have seen before then this itself is referiríaa ethics; It also somehow relate with that seen in class to respond to the caller as "should" is saying it's something that nobody should force you to do and something that by itself has to change.

"Every view of relative value is merely a statement of facts and, therefore, can be expressed so as to lose all semblance of value judgments" (Wittgenstein, 1930) and this happens because "no enunctoo much of this in fact may never be or imply an absolute value judgments "(Wittgenstein, 1930), In my opinion these two phrases are the ones that best describe the theory of Wittgenstein.

Wittgenstein and Aristotle agree Savater similarly, that it is virtually impossible to make a book of ethics, because this would destroy all other books in the world, I say similarly because while Aristotle said it is impossible because it would contain all you need to know in life, Wittgenstein claims that it is because of being a true book about policy that only contain relative value judgments andthen ethical meaningless because "no propositions which, in any absolute sense, are sublime, important or trivial, Savater other hand in his own book quotes Wittgenstein:" After all, it is very probable, that even in the case of a real book of ethics, at least if Wittgenstein was right. "(Savater, 2008), giving the whole reason this ú , last, and Having found the above came to mind a phrase that expresses Wilde in introducing his book The Picture of Dorian Gray "There is no moral or immortal booksales. Books are well written or badly written. That's all "(Wilde, 2007),

on this phrase I think it would be a kind of tautology, but it is interesting the part that says there is no moral books, or books and there is also no tico, as they say Savater and Aristotle.

Something very remarkable is that Wittgenstein says that "would just facts, facts, and facts, not ethics" (Wittgenstein, 1930), which refers to understand that facts are never é policy and form to what we have learned this is correct, since ethics is responsible for the actions and not the facts that simply indicatesdelineate agency action. For the author of the ethics conference is indescribable, a supernatural entity so short of the value of a trivial fact, but then what will reach the value of a stock?

Wittgenstein also discusses an absolute good, "the greatest good must necessarily be perfect" (Aristotle, 2006), which says it is "a describable state of affairs, it would be that all the world, regardless of your tastes and inclinations, necessarily take place or feel guilty for not doing so "(Wittgenstein, 1930) and also says it is a state of illusion, with qThe author continues to use bad words and word Time

astonishment, which can only be used correctly as long as what amazes us is something that is impossible to imagine otherwise, or whether is correct to say that ethics is extraordinary. "I'm amazed that something is as it is, when I could conceive that I was not as is" (Wittgenstein, 1930). Then comes the turn of the phrase "feel absolutely certain" bad "because we use many at some point we said and not realizing we are wrong to use, it is impossible to be sure no matter what, because that would be an absolute value judgments, but is innd that: "We can not express what I want to express and that everything we say about the absolutely miraculous meaningless" (Wittgenstein, 1930). the end the author just says that what he says "ethics adds nothing in any way, to our knowledge" (Wittgenstein, 1930), which gave me to understand that no good study ethic is so absolute as it is impossible to study it.

In conclusion I would give my general opinion, quoting something he said platter that said, "As the world

The Philosophical Reviews, 1997

Oscar Wilde

The Picture of Dorian Gray

Porrúa a, 2007

Compiled by: Lidia Maria Riba

magic words about happiness ...


Vergara & Riba, 2005 CHT MLXC

Tuesday, November 18, 2008

Fla.gators Birthday Cake Drinking and smoking ... q Wonderful Life

Ahh sorry for the delay with some of these things but I'm busy studying (RL sucks).

George, the funky friend
First you talk about the gossip par excellence, that you have read already, but not funny if not comentaís me right? xD
recently, thanks to my wonderful f-list and someone reported me, I found out who it was that George was so fond of "the gang of Akanishi" (wtf, it now appears that they call it, not fuck with me). For a long time I found out just shortly before the scandal came out with that George (ortake your dog in the bag ....) Koki wearing sunglasses.
Aburriiiido. It would have been more fun if it had happened as he says Koki Uwasako and carry a gun, had robbed the video store after the clerk had been abducted (this is because of my own) had demanded a helicopter and 1 million euros release and ... buahh I make up a bad Steven Seagal movie. Anyway, that. As boring as that Koki and Lena come together or sleeping together, or whatever you want to imagine.


Nagase ... chan chan cha-chaaannnn

.... Omfg ... asafkshers reafwe? Yes, this rumor is that it stay that way. And is that according to the Tokyo Sports

, 7 November, during his partyyou; to Cuba as it was thought that it was ripping the driver, picked up a little and rode the scandal in the street, more than violent drunk. And so end up calling the cops. Everyone knows that a drunk can assemble it in the street (without being violent.) Well, that's my opinion ... What about yours?
Yuma do not like the taekwondo?

And now we're out of the JE, but we continue with the course of arrest for alcohol / Dorgan / multiple scandals. Ohhh
our Yuma, our boss of bedroom .... What happened? xD funny thing about this storyis the face of the picture, do not miss it. Supposedly
Yuma Ishigaki (actor, boss of bedroom in Hana Kimi), was recently arrested. Why? It turns out that last Friday, he went to dine / drink in Setagaya with three friends, and were well until 5 am. Then the place closed, so they left. But Yuma realized he had forgotten the portfolio, which returned to the place to look. Do not know what you have told the waiter should have called gay or something, but the point is that the issue ended with Yuma hitting the waiter several times in the head. Obviously the police came, andthe story does not end there. To conclude his "streak of good and intelligent actions of the day", Yuma ended fighting with police at the station, continued to resist, and gave him a kick in the mouth of one of the police. So now instead of being charged with 'hit the waiter' ends accused of 'attack the authority "and" obstruction of action of the authority' and that sort of thing. In other words, double fucked, double stupid.
He was released yesterday, and during his public apology, admitted he was completely drunk and not remember anything. For now, be & aacute, low self-hold on the job while the case of the incident of assault to the waiter comes to the hands of the prosecutor. In your profile page for Hori Pro
(your agency) is described as a "taekwondo enthusiast." Uuuuuuuu .... xD what
miedito (Yuma fronted for the official apology xD)


Oguri and Yamada (how tiring)

Rumors again about Oguri Shun and Yu Yamada. Yes, again rumors that the couple is "sooo in love" as it seems. At least not him. There were rumors that had broken down, rumors that Yamada was commissioned to deny, asmade on October 27 while promoting the film Daiseikou Kanna-san desu!. He replied that "they were perfectly fine." Three days before the event, Yamada and Shun were seen at Aqua City Odaiba. According to a witness, Yamada seemed very loving and Shun colgadita arm, come on, stuck like glue. But Shun ... not much.
According to Shukan Josei
mid-October, Shun was seen late one night walking with a girl who was not named Yu Yamada. An employee of a restaurant Kabukichou, Shinjuku, saw them and said, "She clearly was a hostess." He wore sunglasses and a hat but pelo fair attracted a lot of attention. Someone passing by talking to him saying that he had seen Crows Zero and told Shun "Gambatte kudasai." Shun's face response was like, "what incómodoooo", as he pressed his hand to the stranger. The restaurant employee said that Shun has recently seen very often there. Ahh ... little comment. Since the couple began Yamada-Oguri, have only rumors of this style appear ... and you are boring me!




Source:

uwasako , Tokyograph
,

& japan-zoneamp;
kattunlove

Sunday, November 16, 2008

I-cather Console-web Monitor Men and women are equal because we are people.


This entry espesaré my arguments why I think that man is more intelligent than women and why we do not come only to serve, but this time it'll take a most appropriate way to which I made in class, I know many argue that since God said that we come to serve as true and then I'll try is to discuss why I differ with this.

To start I would say something that I was telling a mate and I believe in living the truth is that both men and women are people and behuman thinking is that we are free to decide, or we both have the same freedom, equal rights and it is true that a stand on something and in other fields, but finally we both can do whatever is within our capabilities.

Now in regard to intelligence, first serve has nothing to do with being smarter or not, and second, since both have the same capabilities for then we can both be or reach the same degree of intelligence, so that's why we see a very intelligent man like a very intelligent woman.

I like & iacute, to conclude with two sentences of Savater: First " be the good life can not be something very different to the good life (Savater, 2008), or neither of them could be happy without us, or vice versa, and second that "the increased complexity of life is precisely that, we are not things" (Savater, 2008), therefore if we had only come to serve, then come masters and things being as they are not.

Savater, Fernando
Ethics for Amador
Ariel, 2008

Saturday, November 15, 2008

Gall Bladder Problems More Condition_treatment Missed opportunities.

my fear and was judging something future, which was still uncertain and have missed this opportunity I can never know what had happened and it is likely that despite my fear could have achieved something beyond what I expected and it is notable as the only penalty I have is internal and remorse, and is this that I considered it a moral issue.

In conclusion I believe that everyone should follow the advice that gives Savater : "To avoid the idiocy in any field requires attention" (Savater, 2008), because if pay attentionand we want everything we do and forcefully, we will achieve our only goal is happiness and if, as in this case we do is like losing a step to become happy.

Savater, Fernando

Ethics for Amador

Ariel, 2008

Saturday, November 8, 2008

Swing Sets Designs On Paper

ute, ny although breathing is to us a habit of life or death, is voluntary anyway.

From the above claim that leaving for diastole and systole (contraccióny heart muscle relaxation), although it is said to be an involuntary movement somehow I think that is voluntary, and that if you hold your breath for a long time, hypothetically speaking, that cardiac motion would stop killing the person, then if I decide to hold the long breathing would stop the movement of my heart & OverhaulHTMLXC

(part of homeostasis) Pearson Education, 2004.

Friday, November 7, 2008

How To Keep Travel Trailers Clean My opion of determinism and indeterminism.

and we are deciding, just at this moment while writing this post is a proof that I am deciding to write it, either by obligation must do it because it is my will, while they may be asleep and would be absurd to say that I do because my body needs, because in that case would be better for my body to sleep, to be more clear I think that freedom control our life and being that I can say that our life and destiny depend only on someone ourselves. "Happiness is a conscious choice not an automatic response." (Mildred Barthell).

CHTM, Facing the difficulties and overcome them. That is happiness. "(Samuel Johnson), that is why I think there is a destination for" The man's character is his fate "(Heraclitus)," because I see the end of my rough way that I was the architect of my own destiny "(Amado Nervo, 1915).

Savater, Fernando Ethics for Amador Ariel, 2008

Nervo, loved


In peace CHTML

Saturday, November 1, 2008

Poptropicalookdifferentpoptropica Examples with some concepts previously seen.


The following is all I intend to explain my opinion on different concepts that play an important role in what is moral.

The first concept to introduce is apparent in a phrase I normally use without realizing that the error in the fall to use it, the question "I could make a please? "This matter to analyze it myself I realized that by asking this, my answer is yes or, at worst, a not, but this is realmind is impossible because until I do not give favor to the recipient know is how this might know if you have the ability to power and that is why it follows that the habit of most of us respond " depends it is" and though I had never thought before that is the best way to answer this question.

But when it comes to obligation comes to mind a phrase that my parents always used my grades are low, it is likely that this phrase also have ever used the parents one of my friends, is a typical scolding "you do not work, you do not keep one, your only obligation is studying", or input that is us n saying that the school is not exactly an intentional action, but is something we do not because it is something you need or enjoy, but because it's wing force (an order) and stop after this also say that working is a obligacióny to bring both actions and obligations are giving us to understand that no matter what job you have or whether or not to go to school anyway because it is our Obligation secur; Oacute; it that way would be the same for my grandmother and me.

Now to finish choices and decisions, in my opinion, are two concepts that many have taken as equal at some point, but I think both consist of something similar, only the difference is that we do decide rationally, or we make a decision by an analysis of this, then we can say

choose the same thing only when we choose something that is so irrational, I mean is that what we choose

without thinking about the possible consequences, such as: When Elegimerlo